Key Differences
In short — Cooler Master Cooling X outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Cooler Master Cooling X PC
- Performs up to 87% better in F1 22 than GameMachines Cube - - 254 vs 136 FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 63% cheaper than Cooler Master Cooling X - €1499.0 vs €3999.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing F1 22 than Cooler Master Cooling X - €11.02 vs €15.74 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €3,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
136
53%
Value, €/FPS
€11.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
42%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
97%
Cooler Master Cooling X PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
