Key Differences
In short — Cooler Master Cooling X outperforms the cheaper Captiva on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Captiva is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Cooler Master Cooling X PC
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than Captiva - 666 vs 587 FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Up to 37% cheaper than Cooler Master Cooling X - €2509.0 vs €3999.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Rocket League than Cooler Master Cooling X - €4.27 vs €6.0 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €3,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5964 minutes ago
Buy for €2,509 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5966 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
82%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Cooler Master Cooling X PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
