Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Alienware Aurora R16 outperforms the more expensive Cooler Master Cooling X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Desktop PC
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Cooler Master Cooling X - 215 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Cooler Master Cooling X - €3480.04 vs €3825.69
- Up to 11% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Cooler Master Cooling X - €16.19 vs €18.22 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
210
97.67441860465115%
Value, €/FPS
€18.22/FPS
88.8583973655324%
Price, €
€3825.69
90%
Buy for €3,825.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 548 minutes ago
Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€16.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3480.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €3,480.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
Aug 3rd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Aug 3rd, 2023
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Cooler Master Cooling X PC | vs | Alienware Aurora R16 Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
