The Centaurus Polaris 4AW is at least 2x slower gaming PC Build than the MXZ. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
The MXZ Desktop PC is better in every way
Advantages of the MXZ Desktop PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Centaurus Polaris 4AW vs MXZ for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Average FPS
49
35%
Min 1% FPS
22
26%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
All items are out of stock.
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Arc A380
6 GB GDDR6 | 96-bit
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
24%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
12%
MXZ Desktop PC
Radeon RX 7700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
244.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
549.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.17 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2206
80%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11922
97%
MXZ Desktop PC
Ryzen 5 7600
3.8 GHz | 6-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2748
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
12228
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | MXZ Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Release Date | – |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Ryzen 5 7600 |
| Arc A380 | GPU | Radeon RX 7700 XT |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB | SSD | – |
| – | HDD | – |
