Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper shinobee High End on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing shinobee High End is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 265% better in World of Tanks than shinobee High End - 598 vs 164 FPS
Advantages of shinobee High End Gaming PC
- Up to 79% cheaper than Captiva - €849.0 vs €4089.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing World of Tanks than Captiva - €5.18 vs €6.84 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2500 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
164
27.424749163879596%
Value, €/FPS
€5.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€849
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1732 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
19.233370913190527%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
15.426356589147286%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-10700F
null-core
Single-Core
1612
51.86615186615187%
Multi-Core
7231
34.36460412508316%
Captiva PC | vs | shinobee High End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
