Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 15% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Megaport - 340 vs 296 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 43% cheaper than Captiva - €2349.0 vs €4089.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Captiva - €7.94 vs €12.03 per FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2445 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
296
87.05882352941177%
Value, €/FPS
€7.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2349
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
64.3968432919955%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
63.25581395348837%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
null-core
Single-Core
2975
95.72072072072072%
Multi-Core
19234
91.40766086873872%
Captiva PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
