Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper FANAT on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FANAT is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 148% better in Deathloop than FANAT - 206 vs 83 FPS
Advantages of FANAT Gaming PC
- Up to 80% cheaper than Captiva - €803.32 vs €4089.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Deathloop than Captiva - €9.68 vs €19.85 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€19.85/FPS
48.76574307304785%
Price, €
€4089
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2497 minutes ago
5th Variation
FPS
83
40.29126213592233%
Value, €/FPS
€9.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€803.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €803.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2498 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
8th Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26.62908680947012%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18.310077519379846%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
null-core
Single-Core
2092
67.31016731016732%
Multi-Core
8659
41.15103127079175%
Captiva PC | vs | FANAT Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1000 GB SSD |
