Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper SYSTEMTREFF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing SYSTEMTREFF is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 63% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than SYSTEMTREFF - 88 vs 54 FPS
Advantages of SYSTEMTREFF Gaming PC
- Up to 39% cheaper than Captiva - €1284.90 vs €2119.00
- Up to 1% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Captiva - €23.79 vs €24.08 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €2,119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8609 minutes ago
143rd Variation
FPS
54
61%
Value, €/FPS
€23.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1284.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,284.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8615 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
7th Variation
143rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
143rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
52%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
143rd Variation
Ryzen 9 5950X
3.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2189
86%
Multi-Core
12159
82%
Captiva PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 5950X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
