Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the more expensive ROG NUC Mini-Gaming-PC Mini- on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than ROG NUC Mini-Gaming-PC Mini- - 191 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than ROG NUC Mini-Gaming-PC Mini- - €2189.0 vs €2345.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than ROG NUC Mini-Gaming-PC Mini- - €11.46 vs €12.47 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 251 minutes ago
Buy for €2,345 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | ROG NUC Mini-Gaming-PC Mini- Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
