Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Memory is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 32% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 403 vs 306 FPS
Advantages of Memory PC
- Up to 51% cheaper than Captiva - €1039.0 vs €2099.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Captiva - €3.4 vs €5.21 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €2,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52234 minutes ago
313rd Variation
FPS
306
75.93052109181141%
Value, €/FPS
€3.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1039
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,039 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
7th Variation
313rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
313rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76.83080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75.71365832235398%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
313rd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
82.29740361919748%
Multi-Core
8659
58.18829379745984%
Captiva PC | vs | Memory PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |