Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 31% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - 88 vs 67 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 50% cheaper than Captiva - €1099.0 vs €2199.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Captiva - €16.4 vs €24.99 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15767 minutes ago
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
7th Variation
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
