Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 50 (N50-640) on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Acer Nitro 50 (N50-640) is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 59% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Acer Nitro 50 (N50-640) - 94 vs 59 FPS
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 (N50-640) Gaming PC
- Up to 54% cheaper than Captiva - €999.0 vs €2189.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Captiva - €16.93 vs €23.29 per FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Jan 31st, 2022
FPS
59
62%
Value, €/FPS
€16.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
7th Variation
Jan 31st, 2022
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Jan 31st, 2022
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
43%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
Jan 31st, 2022
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2179
85%
Multi-Core
8847
59%
Captiva PC | vs | Acer Nitro 50 (N50-640) Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jan 31st, 2022 |
Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i5-12400 |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |