Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms Megaport on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 62% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 175 vs 108 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 8609 minutes ago
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8609 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
6th Variation
30th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
55%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
