Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Neo - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 70% better in God of War than GameMachines Neo - - 146 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing God of War than GameMachines Neo - - €15.82 vs €16.97 per FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Up to 37% cheaper than Captiva - €1459.0 vs €2309.0
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6978 minutes ago
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
Captiva PC | vs | GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
