Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 44% better in Immortals of Aveum than Megaport - 75 vs 52 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 35% cheaper than Captiva - €1629.0 vs €2509.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Captiva - €31.33 vs €33.45 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,509 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74687 minutes ago
33rd Variation
FPS
52
69.33333333333334%
Value, €/FPS
€31.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1629
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,629 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74696 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
33rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
33rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
94.82758620689654%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
88.50574712643679%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
33rd Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
81.78893178893179%
Multi-Core
14881
70.72046383423628%
Captiva PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |