Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Neo - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Neo - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 65% better in F1 22 than GameMachines Neo - - 224 vs 136 FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC
- Up to 48% cheaper than Captiva - €1459.0 vs €2789.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing F1 22 than Captiva - €10.73 vs €12.45 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €2,789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
136
60%
Value, €/FPS
€10.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1459
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 225 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
5th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
95%
Multi-Core
19234
91%
Captiva PC | vs | GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
