Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the cheaper Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Up to 28% cheaper than Memory - €1989.0 vs €2769.0
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 52% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Captiva - 134 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Captiva - €20.66 vs €22.6 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Buy for €2,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
4th Variation
24th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
59%
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
24th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
