Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GameMachines Cube - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 32% better in Monster Hunter: World than GameMachines Cube - - 172 vs 130 FPS
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Up to 25% cheaper than Captiva - €1499.0 vs €1989.0
- Up to 0% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Captiva - €11.53 vs €11.56 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
130
75%
Value, €/FPS
€11.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
4th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
51%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
