Key Differences
In short — ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End outperforms the cheaper Captiva on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Captiva is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Up to 51% cheaper than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €1749.0 vs €3599.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing World of Tanks than ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End - €5.41 vs €7.42 per FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 50% better in World of Tanks than Captiva - 485 vs 323 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
FPS
323
66.59793814432989%
Value, €/FPS
€5.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 798 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
485
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.42/FPS
72.911051212938%
Price, €
€3599
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 472 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
55.46218487394958%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
55.80882352941177%
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
85.44537815126051%
Multi-Core
14881
77.36820214204013%
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | ERAZER Hunter X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
