The Captiva is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming PC Build than the ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End and it's also a worse value for money, as it's €438.92 more expensive!
Advantages of the Captiva PC
The ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC is better in every way
Advantages of the ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
- A slightly faster PC Build for gaming
- Up to 19% cheaper – €1899.95 vs €2338.87
- A better value for money for gaming
Captiva vs ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
3rd Variation
Average FPS
158
100%
Min 1% FPS
97
100%
Price, €
€1899.95
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.02/FPS
100%
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Captiva PC
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
80%
Texture Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
82%
FP32
29.15 TFLOPS
82%
ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.48 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2608
96%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
15118
91%
ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC
3rd Variation
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2713
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
16688
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Captiva PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | ERAZER Engineer X30 High-End Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i7-14700F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| - | SSD | 2 TB |
| - | HDD | - |
