Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Nitro 50 (N50-656) on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than Nitro 50 (N50-656) - 626 vs 616 FPS
Advantages of Nitro 50 (N50-656) Gaming PC
- Up to 2% cheaper than Captiva - €1199.0 vs €1219.0
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €1,219 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58199 minutes ago
Mar 12th, 2024
FPS
616
98.40255591054313%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
3rd Variation
Mar 12th, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Mar 12th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97.04190632703367%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
68.50348027842227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
90.25531914893618%
Multi-Core
9729
85.65014525926577%
Mar 12th, 2024
Core i5-14400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2350
100%
Multi-Core
11359
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | Nitro 50 (N50-656) Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Mar 12th, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i5-14400F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
