Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 1% cheaper than Captiva - €1129.0 vs €1139.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Captiva - €13.13 vs €13.24 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Captiva PC Advanced Gaming R78-739 | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X | Mainboard A520M | 32GB DDR4 RAM | RTX 4060 Ti 16GB | 1TB M.2 SSD | Windows 11 Home
Buy for €1,139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 906 minutes ago
Megaport Gaming PC AMD Ryzen 7 5700X • Windows 11 • GeForce RTX 4060Ti 16GB • 32GB DDR4 • 1000GB M.2 SSD • Luftkühlung • WLAN • Gamer PC Computer Gaming Rechner
Buy for €1,129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 904 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Captiva PC
3rd Variation
Megaport Gaming PC
19th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Captiva PC
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Megaport Gaming PC
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Captiva PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
