Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the more expensive GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 14% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GameMachines Cube - - 92 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than GameMachines Cube - - €1139.0 vs €1349.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GameMachines Cube - - €12.38 vs €16.65 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €1,139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 335 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
81
88.04347826086956%
Value, €/FPS
€16.65/FPS
74.35435435435437%
Price, €
€1349
84%
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
97.04190632703367%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
68.50348027842227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
83.9667458432304%
Multi-Core
9729
71.80603734592958%
6th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2526
100%
Multi-Core
13549
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |