Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Captiva outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGIC Mini on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 156% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than ACEMAGIC Mini - 92 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 32% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than ACEMAGIC Mini - €13.25 vs €19.42 per FPS
Advantages of ACEMAGIC Mini PC
- Up to 43% cheaper than Captiva - €699.0 vs €1219.0
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €1,219 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75694 minutes ago
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
76.253081347576%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
40.37122969837586%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
88.81909547738694%
Multi-Core
9729
86.9436997319035%
Captiva PC | vs | ACEMAGIC Mini PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | Radeon 780M |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
