Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms SYSTEMTREFF Basic on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 259% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than SYSTEMTREFF Basic - 79 vs 22 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 311 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
22
28%
Value, €/FPS
€29.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€649.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €649.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 311 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
Radeon Vega 8
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
64 GTexel/s
32%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-11700F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2101
100%
Multi-Core
8790
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700G
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1983
94%
Multi-Core
8740
99%
Captiva PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF Basic Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11700F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700G |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB HDD |
