Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms Skytech Archangel on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 42% better in No Man's Sky than Skytech Archangel - 104 vs 73 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
71%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-11700F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2135
100%
Multi-Core
8705
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 3600
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1614
76%
Multi-Core
6912
79%
Captiva PC | vs | Skytech Archangel Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 3600 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
