The Captiva is at least 2x faster gaming PC Build than the MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Captiva PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Advantages of the MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
The Captiva PC is better in every way
Captiva PC vs MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Captiva PC
10th Variation
Average FPS
219
100%
Min 1% FPS
144
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
1st Variation
Average FPS
44
20%
Min 1% FPS
19
13%
Price, €
€1199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€27.25/FPS
100%
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Captiva PC
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
82.58 TFLOPS
100%
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
7%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
4%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Captiva PC
10th Variation
Core i9-13900KF
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2919
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
19623
100%
MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC
1st Variation
Core i5-12400
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2207
76%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
8857
45%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Captiva PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | MEDION ERAZER Engineer E10 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900KF | CPU | Core i5-12400 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB | SSD | 512 GB |
| - | HDD | - |
