Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Boost Boxx on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Boost Boxx is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Boost Boxx Gaming PC
- Up to 77% cheaper than Captiva - €929.0 vs €4109.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing World of Tanks than Captiva - €4.53 vs €6.87 per FPS
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 192% better in World of Tanks than Boost Boxx - 598 vs 205 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
205
34.280936454849495%
Value, €/FPS
€4.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€929
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €929 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144152 minutes ago
Buy for €4,109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26.62908680947012%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18.310077519379846%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
65.28314028314028%
Multi-Core
8539
40.58074327535405%
8th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Boost Boxx Gaming PC | vs | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
