Key Differences
In short — Boost Boxx outperforms the cheaper CSL on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing CSL is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Boost Boxx Gaming PC
- Performs up to 63% better in No Man's Sky than CSL - 132 vs 81 FPS
Advantages of CSL Gaming PC
- Up to 63% cheaper than Boost Boxx - €579.0 vs €1579.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Boost Boxx - €7.15 vs €11.96 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.96/FPS
59.78260869565217%
Price, €
€1579
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144065 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
81
61.36363636363637%
Value, €/FPS
€7.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 719 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
48.14563928873836%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
60.20321761219305%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
3rd Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
71.08662613981764%
Multi-Core
7692
52.11735212412765%
Boost Boxx Gaming PC | vs | CSL Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
