Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Ankermann Business Gaming V2 PC
- Up to 44% cheaper than Megaport - €699.0 vs €1249.0
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 115% better in World of Warcraft than Ankermann Business V2 - 187 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ankermann Business V2 - €6.68 vs €8.03 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FPS
87
46.524064171122994%
Value, €/FPS
€8.03/FPS
83.18804483188045%
Price, €
€699
100%
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 661 minutes ago
4th Variation
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1249
55%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 656 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
33.63636363636363%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
20.474308300395258%
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
Ankermann Business Gaming V2 PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 1700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
