Key Differences
In short — Alienware Aurora R16 outperforms Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 222 vs 185 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
185
83%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
77th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
53%
GPU Winner
77th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
77th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
96%
Multi-Core
20148
96%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Alienware Aurora R16 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 6 TB HDD |
