Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation outperforms Dell XPS 8950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 24% better in F1 22 than Dell XPS 8950 - 254 vs 205 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
254
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 3090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
68%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
73%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2620
88%
Multi-Core
15445
77%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Modelling Editing Rendering Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Dell XPS 8950 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Core i9-12900K |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3090 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD |
