Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation outperforms Velztorm Septex CTO on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 37% better in F1 22 than Velztorm Septex CTO - 289 vs 211 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6900 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
65%
Texel Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
56%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
94%
Multi-Core
15263
73%
Adamant Custom 24-Core Liquid Cooled Video Editing Rendering Media Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Velztorm Septex CTO Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700X |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 8 TB SSD |