Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation outperforms Greed® MK2 - High End on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC
- Performs up to 221% better in Starfield than Greed® MK2 - High End - 61 vs 19 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
61
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
2nd Variation
FPS
19
31%
Value, €/FPS
€51.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€979.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €979.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 395 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
36%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
73%
Multi-Core
9729
50%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | Greed® MK2 - High End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
