Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms SYSTEMTREFF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 55% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than SYSTEMTREFF - 132 vs 85 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
181st Variation
FPS
85
64%
Value, €/FPS
€17.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1454.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,454.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
181st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
181st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
27%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
181st Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
100%
Multi-Core
15263
78%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | SYSTEMTREFF Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700X |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
