The Acer Nitro 50 N50 is at least 2x slower gaming PC Build than the Captiva. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
The Captiva PC is better in every way
Advantages of the Captiva PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Acer Nitro 50 N50 vs Captiva for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
1st Variation
Average FPS
45
42%
Min 1% FPS
19
31%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Captiva PC
3rd Variation
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
62
100%
Price, €
€1229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.48/FPS
100%
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
44%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
27%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
14%
Captiva PC
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
22.06 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC
1st Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2221
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
9125
94%
Captiva PC
3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2145
97%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
9696
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Acer Nitro 50 N50 Gaming Desktop PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Captiva PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 4 TB | SSD | - |
| 12 TB | HDD | - |
