Key Differences
In short — Acer Nitro 50 N50-640 outperforms the cheaper Beelink SER7 Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 7840HS (8C/16T, up to 5.1GHz) Mini on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Beelink SER7 Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 7840HS (8C/16T, up to 5.1GHz) Mini is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Nitro 50 N50-640 Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 44% better in Dead Space than Beelink SER7 Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 7840HS (8C/16T, up to 5.1GHz) Mini - 62 vs 43 FPS
Advantages of Beelink SER7 Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 7840HS (8C/16T, up to 5.1GHz) Mini Computer PC
- Up to 44% cheaper than Acer Nitro 50 N50-640 - €789.0 vs €1406.24
- Up to 19% better value when playing Dead Space than Acer Nitro 50 N50-640 - €18.35 vs €22.68 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 21st, 2022
FPS
62
100%
Value, €/FPS
€22.68/FPS
80.90828924162258%
Price, €
€1406.24
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,406.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43391 minutes ago
FPS
43
69.35483870967742%
Value, €/FPS
€18.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€789
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43389 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 21st, 2022
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 21st, 2022
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
91.91810344827586%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
69.94974874371859%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 21st, 2022
Core i5-12400
null-core
Single-Core
2179
91.24790619765494%
Multi-Core
8847
79.06166219839143%
Acer Nitro 50 N50-640 Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Beelink SER7 Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 7840HS (8C/16T, up to 5.1GHz) Mini Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 21st, 2022 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7840HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | Radeon 780M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
