Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive ACEMAGIC Tank03 Mini on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 45% better in No Man's Sky than ACEMAGIC Tank03 Mini - 160 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than ACEMAGIC Tank03 Mini - €1499.00 vs €1599.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing No Man's Sky than ACEMAGIC Tank03 Mini - €9.37 vs €14.55 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 322 minutes ago
31st Variation
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 324 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
44%
GPU Winner
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
91%
CPU Winner
31st Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
95%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
ACEMAGIC Tank03 Mini Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
