Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ACEMAGIC Mini outperforms the more expensive Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ACEMAGIC Mini PC
- Performs up to 10% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - 259 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Memory - €699.0 vs €779.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Memory - €2.7 vs €3.3 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75163 minutes ago
320th Variation
FPS
236
91.11969111969111%
Value, €/FPS
€3.3/FPS
81.81818181818183%
Price, €
€779
89%
Buy for €779 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
320th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
100%
320th Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
57.41379310344827%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
66.98275862068965%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
320th Variation
Core i9-11900F
2.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2171
90.91289782244556%
Multi-Core
9171
81.95710455764075%
ACEMAGIC Mini PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Core i9-11900F |
| Radeon 780M | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 240 GB SSD + 2 TB HDD |
