Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Victus 16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1011 days newer than Victus 16.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 225% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Victus 16 - 65 vs 20 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
65
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jul 25th, 2021
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jul 25th, 2021
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Victus 16 Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 25th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
