Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8- outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 53% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8- - €999.00 vs €2129.00
- Up to 37% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8- - €34.45 vs €54.59 per FPS
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8 Gaming- Laptop
- Performs up to 34% better in Immortals of Aveum than TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 - 39 vs 29 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
FPS
39
100%
Value, €/FPS
€54.59/FPS
63%
Price, €
€2129
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72-97H8 Gaming- Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
