Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 outperforms the more expensive GIGABYTE AORUS 15 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 14% cheaper than GIGABYTE AORUS 15 - €1199.0 vs €1399.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GIGABYTE AORUS 15 - €32.41 vs €37.81 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Nov 10th, 2023 • 4th Variation
FPS
37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€37.81/FPS
85%
Price, €
€1399
85%
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Nov 10th, 2023 • 4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
Nov 10th, 2023 • 4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Nov 10th, 2023 • 4th Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop | vs | GIGABYTE AORUS 15 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2023 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 500 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
