Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- outperforms the cheaper TULPAR A5 V19.2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR A5 V19.2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll Gaming- Laptop
- Performs up to 400% better in Starfield than TULPAR A5 V19.2 - 60 vs 12 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR A5 V19.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 85% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- - €699.0 vs €4711.35
- Up to 26% better value when playing Starfield than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- - €58.25 vs €78.52 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 1st Variation
FPS
60
100%
Value, €/FPS
€78.52/FPS
74.18492103922569%
Price, €
€4711.35
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €4,711.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6283 minutes ago
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
22.276080084299263%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
13.128274791383662%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 1st Variation
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll Gaming- Laptop | vs | TULPAR A5 V19.2 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 23rd, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i5-12500 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
