Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll Gaming- Laptop
- Performs up to 71% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 - 24 vs 14 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 72% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- - €999.00 vs €3537.88
- Up to 52% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- - €71.36 vs €147.41 per FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Jan 10th, 2024 • 4th Variation
FPS
24
100%
Value, €/FPS
€147.41/FPS
48%
Price, €
€3537.88
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,537.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Jan 10th, 2024 • 4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 10th, 2024 • 4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 10th, 2024 • 4th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll Gaming- Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 10th, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
3840x2160 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
