Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.8 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.8 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll Gaming- Laptop
- Performs up to 108% better in Starfield than TULPAR T7 V20.8 - 54 vs 26 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.8 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 77% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- - €901.54 vs €3892.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Starfield than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- - €34.67 vs €72.09 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 2nd Variation
FPS
54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€72.09/FPS
48.09266195033985%
Price, €
€3892.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,892.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6284 minutes ago
FPS
26
48.148148148148145%
Value, €/FPS
€34.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€901.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €901.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6283 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
68.10810810810811%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
46.95832254724308%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 2nd Variation
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll Gaming- Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.8 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 23rd, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
