Key Differences
In short — Predator Triton 17 X (PTX17-71-91JV) outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Predator Triton 17 X (PTX17-71-91JV) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 210% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 - 93 vs 30 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 84% cheaper than Predator Triton 17 X (PTX17-71-91JV) - €859.0 vs €5384.83
- Up to 51% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Predator Triton 17 X (PTX17-71-91JV) - €28.63 vs €57.9 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
May 22nd, 2023
FPS
93
100%
Value, €/FPS
€57.9/FPS
49.447322970639036%
Price, €
€5384.83
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €5,384.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6941 minutes ago
FPS
30
32.25806451612903%
Value, €/FPS
€28.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€859
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6939 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 22nd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
47.797681770284505%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
35.20279448864739%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 22nd, 2023
Core i9-13900
null-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
Predator Triton 17 X (PTX17-71-91JV) Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.8.3 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
17" | Screen Size | 15.6" |