Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz)- on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing ASUS TUF A16 is 980 days newer than the more expensive MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz)-.
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 59% better in Lost Ark than MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz)- - 194 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz)- - €1399.0 vs €1699.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Lost Ark than MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz)- - €7.21 vs €13.93 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
122
62%
Value, €/FPS
€13.93/FPS
51%
Price, €
€1699
82%
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Jan 8th, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53%
Jan 8th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 8th, 2024
Ryzen 9 7845HX
3.0 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2648
100%
Multi-Core
13771
100%
CPU Winner
MSI GF75 Thin 10SC-067 (17,3 Zoll / 144Hz) Gaming- Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| May 3rd, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Ryzen 9 7845HX |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
