Key Differences
In short — MSI Crosshair outperforms MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio 16” 240Hz QHD+ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing MSI Crosshair is 40 days newer than MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio 16” 240Hz QHD+.
Advantages of MSI Crosshair Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio 16” 240Hz QHD+ - 44 vs 41 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Dec 3rd, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Oct 24th, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Dec 3rd, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Oct 24th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Dec 3rd, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Core i7-14650HX
2.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2530
100%
Multi-Core
14291
100%
CPU Winner
Oct 24th, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
95%
Multi-Core
11484
80%
MSI Crosshair Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio 16” 240Hz QHD+ Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| Core i7-14650HX | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |