Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP Pavilion 16.1" Full HD (1920x1080) on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 256% better in Dirt 5 than HP Pavilion 16.1" Full HD (1920x1080) - 128 vs 36 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
79%
Texel Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
53%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
60%
Multi-Core
5396
47%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
HP Pavilion 16.1" Full HD (1920x1080) Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16.1" | Screen Size | 16" |
