Key Differences
In short — HP Omen 16-xd0000sf outperforms the cheaper TULPAR A5 V19.2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR A5 V19.2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of HP Omen 16-xd0000sf Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 70% better in The Last of Us Part I than TULPAR A5 V19.2 - 51 vs 30 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR A5 V19.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 54% cheaper than HP Omen 16-xd0000sf - €699.0 vs €1535.22
- Up to 24% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than HP Omen 16-xd0000sf - €23.3 vs €30.71 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mar 3rd, 2023
FPS
51
100%
Value, €/FPS
€30.71/FPS
75.87105177466623%
Price, €
€1535.22
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,535.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
FPS
30
58.82352941176471%
Value, €/FPS
€23.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€699
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 3rd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 3rd, 2023
Ryzen 7 7840HS
null-core
Single-Core
2388
100%
Multi-Core
11190
100%
CPU Winner
HP Omen 16-xd0000sf Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR A5 V19.2 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Core i5-12500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
